<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Latest posts for the topic "Differences  NESMA & IFPUG Function Point Standards"]]></title>
		<link>http://www.functionpointmodeler.com/forum/posts/list/6.page</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Latest messages posted in the topic "Differences  NESMA & IFPUG Function Point Standards"]]></description>
		<generator>JForum - http://www.jforum.net</generator>
			<item>
				<title>Differences  NESMA &amp; IFPUG Function Point Standards</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ What are differences between [b]NESMA[/b] and [b]IFPUG[/b] Function Point Standards? <br /> Which countries use [b]NESMA[/b]<br /> Do you have any experience with [b]NESMA[/b]<br /> <br /> Thanks<br /> Ilbey Batuhan]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.functionpointmodeler.com/forum/posts/preList/37/111.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.functionpointmodeler.com/forum/posts/preList/37/111.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 10 Jan 2013 20:30:25]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ moeztuerk]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Differences  NESMA &amp; IFPUG Function Point Standards</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ There aren't many differences between the NESMA and IFPUG definitions and counting guidelines for FPA. There is a document describing all the differences, which can be found by clicking [url=http://www.nesma.nl/download/artikelen/FPA%20according%20to%20NESMA%20and%20IFPUG%20-%20the%20present%20situation%20(vs%202011-08-01).pdf]here[/url].<br /> <br /> NESMA is Dutch by origin but it is used in some other countries as well, as far as I know. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.functionpointmodeler.com/forum/posts/preList/37/112.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.functionpointmodeler.com/forum/posts/preList/37/112.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 11 Jan 2013 08:58:55]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Edwin van Gorp]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Aw:Differences  NESMA &amp; IFPUG Function Point Standards</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Hi Edwin,<br /> Thank you very much..<br /> <br /> As far as I have understood, the different is the only in the [i]enhancement project count[/i].  [b]NESMA [/b]use so called [b]Impact Factor [/b] to adjust the enhancement project count.<br /> <br /> Thanks...<br /> Ilbey Batuhan]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.functionpointmodeler.com/forum/posts/preList/37/113.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.functionpointmodeler.com/forum/posts/preList/37/113.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 11 Jan 2013 11:14:16]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ moeztuerk]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Differences  NESMA &amp; IFPUG Function Point Standards</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Many people mix up these concepts, are IFPUG Function Points and NESMA Function Points the same? Without going into details, in this post I try to explain the similarities and differences between IFPUG and NESMA through a simple example.<br /> <br /> <a class="snap_shots" href="http://www.laboratorioti.com/2013/11/27/foolproof-example-know-difference-ifpug-nesma/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.laboratorioti.com/2013/11/27/foolproof-example-know-difference-ifpug-nesma/</a><br /> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.functionpointmodeler.com/forum/posts/preList/37/129.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.functionpointmodeler.com/forum/posts/preList/37/129.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 28 Nov 2013 11:23:14]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ psoneira]]></author>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>